# Testing DM-4692: the new ProcessCcdTask

**URL:** <https://www.rubin.community/t/testing-dm-4692-the-new-processccdtask/507>\
**Category:** Data Management\
**Tags:** dm-dev\
**Created:** [January 29, 2016, 5:02pm UTC](https://www.rubin.community/t/testing-dm-4692-the-new-processccdtask/507 "2016-01-29T17:02:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 19

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rowen](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/www.rubin.community/rowen/32/52_2.png) [@rowen](https://www.rubin.community/u/rowen)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2016, 9:32pm UTC](https://www.rubin.community/t/testing-dm-4692-the-new-processccdtask/507/19 "2016-02-15T21:32:54Z")

</div>

The current results from validate\_drp are as follows:

CFHT astrometric scatter (comparing two visits):

- master: 9.8 mas bright sources, 59.7 mas all sources
- DM-4692: 12.4 mas bright sources (20% worse), 64.3 mas all sources (7% worse)

CFHT photometric scatter:

- master: 13.2 mmag bright sources, 116.4 mmag all sources
- DM-4692: 14.3 mmag bright sources (8% worse), 119.2 mmag all sources (3% worse)

DECam astrometric scatter:

- master: 35.7 mas bright sources, 72.4 mas all sources
- DM-4692: 28.5 mas bright sources (20% better), 66.8 mas all sources (8% better)

DECam photometric scatter:

- master: 63.3 mmag bright sources, 81.2 mmag all sources
- DM-4692: 69.3 mmag bright sources (9% worse), 86.0 mmag all sources (6% worse)

 ![](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/uploads/rubin/original/1X/ab76d895d515e4e890da772f78824bf4a4d266a8.png) ![](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/uploads/rubin/original/1X/b221689cc289f3857321283dec6ea98bde8e57aa.png) ![](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/uploads/rubin/original/1X/d55f87d522b4dc1357d2f70f7b3081bbb6cfc81b.png) ![](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/uploads/rubin/original/1X/00b39aec4ebb8dea8426f3e2fee59d74672e8ae2.png)

---

_[View the full topic](https://www.rubin.community/t/testing-dm-4692-the-new-processccdtask/507)._